Sabine Lisicki vs Maria Sharapova Head to Head Stats

• How important is second serve performance in predicting match outcomes? Both Maria Sharapova and Sabine Lisicki have exhibited a 0% win rate on second serve points over the past six months, indicating no significant advantage for either player from this metric.
• Regarding return game efficiency, both athletes have failed to register any wins on their opponent's second serve points and first serve returns in recent form, suggesting an equal footing in this aspect of the game.
• Under pressure, Sharapova and Lisicki have struggled to save breakpoints, both with a 0% success rate, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in tense situations.
• In terms of overall match wins over the last year, neither player has secured any victories, resulting in a W/L record of 0/0, implying no recent competitive edge for either.
• Sharapova thrives on clay surfaces with a career win rate of 82%, while Lisicki excels on grass with a matching 82% win rate, giving each player a distinct advantage on these surfaces.
• Examining head-to-head history, Sharapova has a commanding lead with 6 victories out of 7 matches against Lisicki. Sharapova has also won 12 of the 16 sets played between them.
• Their most recent encounter was on a hard surface at the U.S. Open in 2014, where Sharapova emerged victorious, suggesting some historical advantage.

Editorial Prediction (December 22, 2025, UTC):

Considering both players have not demonstrated stellar performance in recent forms, key performance indicators such as second serve and return game stats do not give either player a definitive advantage.

Savvy players and fans might note that Sharapova's notable head-to-head record, with a majority of wins over Lisicki, heavily leans in her favor. Likewise, previous wins on similar surfaces increase her chances of success.

Given these insights, despite both players' potential struggle with consistent play lately, Maria Sharapova is more likely to claim victory in the upcoming match based on her historical dominance and marginal surface preference.